Comments for ITC Server http://www.itcserver.com/blog The SAP Consultant's Journey Thu, 09 Feb 2012 07:12:45 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 Comment on Fake Messages [ABAP] by Mati http://www.itcserver.com/blog/2010/08/05/fake-messages-abap/#comment-166214 Mati Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:11:41 +0000 http://www.itcserver.com/blog/?p=461#comment-166214 Nice :)... Noted there's a typo when refering to the IDoc's number field in the code (RV34A instead of RV45A). Nice :)… Noted there’s a typo when refering to the IDoc’s number field in the code (RV34A instead of RV45A).

]]> Comment on Talking to The SAP Recruiter by sap jobs http://www.itcserver.com/blog/2006/07/25/talking-to-the-sap-recruiter/#comment-165784 sap jobs Wed, 19 Oct 2011 11:31:14 +0000 http://www.itcserver.com/blog/2006/07/25/talking-to-the-sap-recruiter/#comment-165784 That´s the way how recruitment business work. The most relevant experience is the one that you have done for the last three years That´s the way how recruitment business work. The most relevant experience is the one that you have done for the last three years

]]> Comment on What is RICEF? by Linda Storm http://www.itcserver.com/blog/2006/07/03/what-is-ricef/#comment-152707 Linda Storm Tue, 06 Sep 2011 16:56:21 +0000 http://www.itcserver.com/blog/2006/07/03/what-is-ricef/#comment-152707 If you are a die hard SAP developer this is very effective way to describing the new oncoming or upgraded service. But if you are outside of the scope of SAP, then maybe use one of the more conventional and understandable approaches such as a TOGAF or something along that line. If you are a die hard SAP developer this is very effective way to describing the new oncoming or upgraded service.

But if you are outside of the scope of SAP, then maybe use one of the more conventional and understandable approaches such as a TOGAF or something along that line.

]]> Comment on If SAP could not Write IDoc File, Check Unicode Format in Port! [SAP] by Diana Greenberg http://www.itcserver.com/blog/2010/10/08/if-sap-could-not-write-idoc-file-check-unicode-format-in-port-sap/#comment-94179 Diana Greenberg Wed, 17 Nov 2010 18:23:20 +0000 http://www.itcserver.com/blog/?p=470#comment-94179 I am having this same error -- but if I push the idoc again (or reverse a payment and let it get picked up in the following day's run) we get no error -- why would this be sporadic?? I am having this same error — but if I push the idoc again (or reverse a payment and let it get picked up in the following day’s run) we get no error — why would this be sporadic??

]]> Comment on User-Exit: EXIT_SAPLF050_008 Change Fields for FI Document [SAP] by Jay Jayaganesh http://www.itcserver.com/blog/2010/04/28/user-exit-exit_saplf050_008-change-fields-for-fi-document-sap/#comment-90495 Jay Jayaganesh Mon, 25 Oct 2010 01:30:39 +0000 http://www.itcserver.com/blog/?p=376#comment-90495 Hi Tuncay, Thank you very much for posting this blog. We are experiencing the exact same issue. This blog gives us a way forward. I hope this article benefits others as much as it did for us. Thanks again Regards, Jay Hi Tuncay,

Thank you very much for posting this blog. We are experiencing the exact same issue. This blog gives us a way forward.
I hope this article benefits others as much as it did for us.

Thanks again
Regards,

Jay

]]> Comment on SAP Bloggers by junior http://www.itcserver.com/blog/2007/01/15/sap-bloggers/#comment-86032 junior Sat, 18 Sep 2010 22:38:00 +0000 http://www.itcserver.com/blog/2007/01/15/sap-bloggers/#comment-86032 Add this to your list.. Would like to add my two cents to the discussion for other people... ABAP (Advanced Business Application Programming), to me, is much like a COBOL and/or C hybrid. The value versus reference feature reminds me of C. The commands (MOVE, WRITE,…) and PERFORMs remind me of COBOL. ABAP constructs (Loops, subroutines, if/then,…) seem similar to constructs in other languages. The only aspects of the language not communicated in this web site are SAP GUI related features (Like functions defined in the SAP GUI). I felt ABAP GUI features/impacts would be too difficult to accurately explain. http://www.learnabapprogramming.com Add this to your list..
Would like to add my two cents to the discussion for other people…
ABAP (Advanced Business Application Programming), to me, is much like a COBOL and/or C hybrid. The value versus reference feature reminds me of C. The commands (MOVE, WRITE,…) and PERFORMs remind me of COBOL. ABAP constructs (Loops, subroutines, if/then,…) seem similar to constructs in other languages. The only aspects of the language not communicated in this web site are SAP GUI related features (Like functions defined in the SAP GUI). I felt ABAP GUI features/impacts would be too difficult to accurately explain.
http://www.learnabapprogramming.com

]]> Comment on What a mistake! Exception CX_SY_DYN_CALL_ILLEGAL_TYPE [SAP] by Dawis http://www.itcserver.com/blog/2010/04/30/what-a-mistake-exception-cx_sy_dyn_call_illegal_type-sap/#comment-82894 Dawis Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:51:21 +0000 http://www.itcserver.com/blog/?p=380#comment-82894 you were right - It does happens when you are tired.. For the whole time I was using iv_partner_PFT instead of iv_partner_FCT.. Damn right - why would it not give you info about which parameter was wrong.. I was allready starting to believe there is whole new dimension of SAP I do not know about and this is first instance I met with that dimension.. Luckily it had nothing to do with DESTINATION keyword you were right - It does happens when you are tired..

For the whole time I was using iv_partner_PFT instead of iv_partner_FCT..

Damn right - why would it not give you info about which parameter was wrong..

I was allready starting to believe there is whole new dimension of SAP I do not know about and this is first instance I met with that dimension.. Luckily it had nothing to do with DESTINATION keyword

]]> Comment on What a mistake! Exception CX_SY_DYN_CALL_ILLEGAL_TYPE [SAP] by Dawis http://www.itcserver.com/blog/2010/04/30/what-a-mistake-exception-cx_sy_dyn_call_illegal_type-sap/#comment-82889 Dawis Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:17:12 +0000 http://www.itcserver.com/blog/?p=380#comment-82889 At least you saw what ws wrong in the end.. This code gives me the same exception... and types are equivalent I am sure.. CALL FUNCTION 'CRM_PARTNER_READ_OW' EXPORTING iv_ref_guid = lv_header_guid iv_ref_kind = 'A'"lv_ref_kind "for header iv_partner_pft = 'Z0000035'"lv_partner_fct "RDC/FDC IMPORTING es_partner_wrk = ls_rdc_partner_wrk EXCEPTIONS error_occurred = 1 parameter_error = 2 entry_does_not_exist = 3 OTHERS = 4. At least you saw what ws wrong in the end..
This code gives me the same exception…
and types are equivalent I am sure..
CALL FUNCTION ‘CRM_PARTNER_READ_OW’
EXPORTING
iv_ref_guid = lv_header_guid
iv_ref_kind = ‘A’”lv_ref_kind “for header
iv_partner_pft = ‘Z0000035′”lv_partner_fct “RDC/FDC
IMPORTING
es_partner_wrk = ls_rdc_partner_wrk
EXCEPTIONS
error_occurred = 1
parameter_error = 2
entry_does_not_exist = 3
OTHERS = 4.

]]> Comment on What is RICEF? by Steven http://www.itcserver.com/blog/2006/07/03/what-is-ricef/#comment-80733 Steven Wed, 14 Jul 2010 13:24:31 +0000 http://www.itcserver.com/blog/2006/07/03/what-is-ricef/#comment-80733 I think it clearly explains what RICEF stands for....what do you mean by general PROSPECTIVE. put some effort and google it, ifyou are not experienced.....instead of expecting to be spoon fed. I think it clearly explains what RICEF stands for….what do you mean by general PROSPECTIVE. put some effort and google it, ifyou are not experienced…..instead of expecting to be spoon fed.

]]> Comment on Changing Printer Speed and Darkness of the Label [Zebra BAR-ONE] by Ira http://www.itcserver.com/blog/2010/05/05/changing-printer-speed-and-darkness-of-the-label-zebra-bar-one/#comment-79042 Ira Tue, 08 Jun 2010 17:14:23 +0000 http://www.itcserver.com/blog/?p=398#comment-79042 Could the author please confirm that BarOne V5 is compatible with Xi4 printers? Could the author please confirm that BarOne V5 is compatible with Xi4 printers?

]]> Comment on IDOC remains in status 62 or 64 by Jens http://www.itcserver.com/blog/2007/06/22/idoc-remains-in-status-62-or-64/#comment-79033 Jens Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:13:18 +0000 http://www.itcserver.com/blog/2007/06/22/idoc-remains-in-status-62-or-64/#comment-79033 Hi, well after getting some upgrades to ERP we also received Status 64 but only for some IDoc-Types. Stepping by to this blogpost shows finally how to solve it. SWU3 and OYEB finally did the job Great stuff!! Thx Hi, well after getting some upgrades to ERP we also received Status 64 but only for some IDoc-Types.
Stepping by to this blogpost shows finally how to solve it.

SWU3 and OYEB finally did the job
Great stuff!!

Thx

]]> Comment on Error: Error while resetting release of segment Z1EDK02 [SAP EDI] by Tuncay Karaca http://www.itcserver.com/blog/2010/04/22/error-error-while-resetting-release-of-segment-z1edk02-sap-edi/#comment-77796 Tuncay Karaca Wed, 12 May 2010 16:10:19 +0000 http://www.itcserver.com/blog/?p=366#comment-77796 @Lien Ho I think you get "Message EA506 - The release of the basis types cannot be reset" in WE30. In this case since the IDOC type was release in a different version, you need to create a new version of IDOC type as successor OR you can extend the IDOC. To me if it is a Z* IDOC type, it is better to create a new one. @Lien Ho

I think you get “Message EA506 - The release of the basis types cannot be reset” in WE30.

In this case since the IDOC type was release in a different version, you need to create a new version of IDOC type as successor OR you can extend the IDOC. To me if it is a Z* IDOC type, it is better to create a new one.

]]> Comment on Error: Error while resetting release of segment Z1EDK02 [SAP EDI] by Lien Ho http://www.itcserver.com/blog/2010/04/22/error-error-while-resetting-release-of-segment-z1edk02-sap-edi/#comment-77751 Lien Ho Tue, 11 May 2010 15:34:57 +0000 http://www.itcserver.com/blog/?p=366#comment-77751 I'm having the same problem, but I'm trying to add new new segment to an existing IDOC type. I'm getting 'ZE_ISU_ENROLL has already been released, only display possible'. There is not an option for 'Add Version' in WE30. It's only available in WE31, changing segment. Does anyone has any suggestion? Thanks! Lien I’m having the same problem, but I’m trying to add new new segment to an existing IDOC type. I’m getting ‘ZE_ISU_ENROLL has already been released, only display possible’. There is not an option for ‘Add Version’ in WE30. It’s only available in WE31, changing segment. Does anyone has any suggestion?

Thanks!
Lien

]]> Comment on The ERP of This Century: SAP by Melodee Claghorn http://www.itcserver.com/blog/2006/05/01/the-erp-of-this-century-sap/#comment-77653 Melodee Claghorn Sat, 08 May 2010 10:51:55 +0000 http://www.itcserver.com/blog/2006/05/01/the-erp-of-this-century-sap/#comment-77653 Pretty good post. I just stumbled upon your site and wanted to saythat I’ve really liked browsing your posts. Anyway I’ll be subscribing to your blog and I hope you write again soon! Pretty good post. I just stumbled upon your site and wanted to saythat I’ve really liked browsing your posts. Anyway I’ll be subscribing to your blog and I hope you write again soon!

]]> Comment on Blogs - April 29, 2010 by Tuncay Karaca http://www.itcserver.com/blog/2010/04/29/blogs-april-29-2010/#comment-77527 Tuncay Karaca Wed, 05 May 2010 16:33:01 +0000 http://www.itcserver.com/blog/?p=378#comment-77527 @Andy I like your SAPGeek.net blog too. So I tagged SAPGeek.net @Andy

I like your SAPGeek.net blog too. So I tagged SAPGeek.net

]]>